Martin & Jones, PLLC
Call today for a Free consultation.

General Mills Arbitration Stance Causes Social Media Uproar

General Mills, Inc., the company that makes popular cereals Cheerios and Cocoa Puffs and also numerous other brands created a firestorm on social media after it began telling customers who joined its online communities that they have given up their right to sue the company by doing so. The company announced a new privacy policy, instituted on April 2, 2014, which provides that General Mills customers must resolve disputes through binding arbitration. With broad wording, it could be asserted that customers had given up their right to sue General Mills by simply “liking” the Facebook page of a General Mills product.

After much consumer outcry, on April 19, 2014, General Mills issued a statement that they were returning to their prior terms. General Mills stated, 'On behalf of our company and our brands, we would also like to apologize. We're sorry we even started down this path. And we do hope you'll accept our apology.'

On behalf of our company and our brands, we would also like to apologize. We’re sorry we even started down this path. And we do hope you’ll accept our apology. We also hope that you’ll continue to download product coupons, talk to us on social media, or look for recipes on our websites. - See more at: http://www.blog.generalmills.com/2014/04/weve-listened-and-were-changing-our-legal-terms-back-to-what-they-were/#sthash.4LyVruS4.dpuf
On behalf of our company and our brands, we would also like to apologize. We’re sorry we even started down this path. And we do hope you’ll accept our apology. We also hope that you’ll continue to download product coupons, talk to us on social media, or look for recipes on our websites. - See more at: http://www.blog.generalmills.com/2014/04/weve-listened-and-were-changing-our-legal-terms-back-to-what-they-were/#sthash.4LyVruS4.dpuf

Forced arbitration is becoming all the more prevalent in the wake of recent United States Supreme Court decisions clearing the way for companies to require arbitration of practically any dispute. With arbitration, disputes are decided by either a single decision-maker as a sole arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators. Typically, the arbitrators are paid by the company that wants to have disputes heard in arbitration rather than in the court system. Arbitrators thus know that the entity paying their fee is the same party that may or may not select that person to hear other disputes to be arbitrated in the future. This creates the risk of “repeat customer” bias, with arbitration results and awards slanted in favor of the companies that send the arbitrators repeat business.

Consumer advocates have worried that the pro-business Supreme Court decisions would result in companies employing aggressive tactics such as those of General Mills in an effort to guarantee that all disputes an individual may ever have with a company must be resolved in arbitration. Legislation was proposed that would limit the situations in which companies can force arbitration on their customers and others with whom they deal. Unfortunately, the legislation has been stuck in committee for nearly a year. The Arbitration Fairness Act was assigned to a congressional committee on May 7, 2013. If passed, the Arbitration Fairness Act would prevent forced arbitration in any employment, consumer, antitrust, or civil rights dispute. Concerned citizens should urge their congressional representatives to seek action on and enactment of the Arbitration Fairness Act.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Testimonials

Contact US Get Help Now

Send us an email or call us today at 800-662-1234 to speak with an attorney about your claim or to arrange a free consultation. It costs nothing to call and there is no obligation. In fact, we are not paid until your case is resolved. Se habla español. If you are unable to travel to one of our offices in Raleigh, Durham and Wilmington, we will meet with you at your location.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Raleigh Office
410 Glenwood Avenue
Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27603

Toll Free: 800-662-1234
Phone: 919-821-0005
Raleigh Law Office Map

Wilmington Office
1213 Culbreth Drive
Suite 121
Wilmington, NC 28405

Toll Free: 800-662-1234
Phone: 910-256-4005
Wilmington Law Office Map

Durham Office
302 East Pettigrew Street
Suite 330
Durham, NC 27701

Toll Free: 800-662-1234
Phone: 919-544-3000
Durham Law Office Map