Martin & Jones, PLLC
Call today for a Free consultation.

Supreme Court Arbitration Decision Likely to Curtail Many Claims

The United States Supreme Court issued a decision recently that will almost certainly curtail numerous meritorious claims. In the case of American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-3 decision that corporations can force arbitration on small businesses and individuals even when it can be proven that the forced arbitration clause in the contract is too costly or inherently unfair.

The Supreme Court’s Opinion in the American Express case follows its decisions in CompuCredit v. Greenwood and AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, two decisions that have made it much more difficult for consumes and employees to challenge mandatory arbitration clauses. Although those decisions were decidedly pro-business, the Supreme Court suggested that arbitration is acceptable only so long as parties can “effectively vindicate their substantive rights,” leading consumer advocates to hope that the Supreme Court would strike down any arbitration clause which worked as a “liability shield” by effectively precluding the pursuit of legal claims. With the American Express ruling, the Supreme Court has now made clear that the “effective vindication” verbiage is of no consequence. The Supreme Court will uphold an arbitration clause even if it means that a party will not be able to challenge unfair or overreaching conduct.

In the American Express case, a group of small business merchants brought a class action in court alleging that American Express is violating antitrust laws with a tying arrangement by using its monopoly power over charge cards to force merchants to take all AmEx credit cards and pay higher fees. The merchants sought to pursue claims against American Express jointly in a class action lawsuit. American Express moved to force the case into individual arbitration with no class action possible. The merchants presented evidence showing that the costs of an individual arbitration would have been many times more than the possible maximum amount of damages that each would recover. For example, the costs of a single antitrust market study necessary for each arbitration would exceed $1 million, while each claimant’s potential damages would be no more than $5,000. Because the arbitration clause prevented the sharing of costs that a class action would allow and did not provide any other means for the merchants to recover those costs, it would be impossible for the merchants to vindicate their rights under federal antitrust law through individual arbitrations. The Supreme Court majority held that the arbitration clause would control, despite the evidence that it effectively precluded the merchants from challenging violations of the antitrust laws and shielded AmEx from any challenge to its business practices.

In dissent, Justice Elena Kagan said the ruling allows wrongdoers to immunize themselves against lawsuits. She noted that American Express had used its market power to impose the contract on retailers. “If the arbitration clause is enforceable, AmEx has insulated itself from antitrust liability - even if it has in fact violated the law,” Justice Kagan wrote. “The monopolist gets to use its monopoly to insist on a contract effectively depriving its victims of all legal recourse.”

The Supreme Court’s steady stream of pro-business, pro-arbitration decisions heightens the importance of Congress passing the Arbitration Fairness Act. The Act would provide individuals with a choice to arbitrate a claim rather than forcing them into arbitration simply because the party with superior bargaining power, usually a large corporation or an employer, wants it that way. Additionally, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has the power to ban or regulate forced arbitration and is in the process of completing an arbitration study mandated under the Dodd-Frank Act. Concerned consumers and employees should contact their elected representatives and urge them to pass the Arbitration Fairness Act. Additionally, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is accepting input on the issue in determining whether that agency should take action to prohibit or restrict mandatory arbitration clauses in certain consumer agreements.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Martin & Jones Reviews

  • "I just wanted you to know how much my family and I appreciate the work that you (Mike Riley) and everyone at Martin & Jones have done for us over the years. The initial settlements helped Mom and Dad live comfortably during his illness and afforded him the care that he needed. Since his passing nine years ago, your continued efforts on our behalf have been nothing short of a blessing. Mom, who will be 92 in September, has many medical issues but is still very sharp mentally, and enjoys being able to live at home. I just want you and everyone at Martin & Jones to know how grateful we are."

    Fred G., whose father had mesothelioma
  • "Thank you for everything that you have done for us. We are fortunate to know you. We appreciate all of the hard work, long hours and care that was shown to us before and during the trial. Without your help and representing us, we would not be as blessed as we are now. All of you are very special to us. We know that you have the best and attorneys and staff there is."

    Hazel P.
  • "Thank you for your concern of my well-being every time I spoke with you. It always meant so much. I hear nothing but awful stories of dealing with attorneys and their offices, but I have had nothing but positive experience. You have many special ways of working with people in need of help. Words can never express the way your support has been so helpful. I pray you will continue to help others. I wish you all the best."

    Mary C
  • "Forest, once again, my family and I thank you for obtaining another settlement on behalf of my Father. It's almost uncanny that these checks seem to come at very opportune times. This one comes as we are expecting our fourth grandchild. It will provide her some sound footing towards her future college education, plus help Mom and Dad with the medical expenses. Sometimes, I think my Dad is helping you guys with this. Maybe so. Anyway, thank you again for your hard work."

    Mike G.
  • "I appreciate all you're doing and trying to do for me. I don't think I've ever talked to a nicer attorney than Mike, and his assistant (certified paralegal Marjorie Kartanson). You're real nice people. It really makes you feel better, even with all the problems I have."

    Larry A.
  • "Thank you for the work you have done for Carl and our family. We so much appreciate your sincere professionalism and kindness you showed us. I know Carl is smiling right now and the Lord has blessed us through you. May God bless you."

    Connie M. whose husband Carl worked as a brakeman for CSX Transportation and died of mesothelioma
  • "Thank you for always making me feel welcome and at ease in your office. I respect the work you do and your enthusiasm for it and am grateful for your talents."

    Tracy M.
  • "I would like to leave a testimonial thanking Steven and Allison for their care and understanding. Steven's pursuit and success in getting some compensation for our loss. A final closure of our loss of brother Mike. Thanks to Martin & Jones for looking after Mike's care since his injury in 2005. You have been there for Mike and his family for a long time. Mike passed in 2016 and you stood for the family up to the present (July 2017). Many thanks."

    Dan I.
  • "We would like to express our gratitude to you (Hunt Willis) for accepting our case. First of all, when I called this law firm, a very sweet and kind lady answered the telephone and gave me assurance by asking and going over the accident with me, while my husband was in the hospital. I felt assured I was doing the right thing for us. She was so helpful in so many ways. What a professional lady. Secondly, we are much pleased that you have settled this case with the insurance company to receive the proper amount to assist us in so many ways. My husband and I are very happy with you and the firm in handling our case. You made us have confidence in your professional and integrity along with your assistant Ms. Routh, when you both came to see us in our home, in which we saw your compassion and thoughtfulness at that time. We will never forget what you have done for us, and we thank the lord for directing me to contact this firm. I’m glad I did."


"Thank you for your concern of my well-being every time I spoke with you. It always meant so much. I hear nothing but awful stories of dealing with attorneys and their offices, but I have had nothing but positive experience. You have many special ways of working with people in need of help. Words can never express the way your support has been so helpful. I pray you will continue to help others. I wish you all the best."

Mary C
View More Reviews
Contact US Get Help Now

Send us an email or call us today at 800-662-1234 to speak with an attorney about your claim or to arrange a free consultation. It costs nothing to call and there is no obligation. In fact, we are not paid until your case is resolved. Se habla español. If you are unable to travel to one of our offices in Raleigh, Durham and Wilmington, we will meet with you at your location.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Raleigh Office
410 Glenwood Avenue
Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27603

Toll Free: 800-662-1234
Phone: 919-821-0005
Raleigh Law Office Map

Wilmington Office
1213 Culbreth Drive
Suite 121
Wilmington, NC 28405

Toll Free: 800-662-1234
Phone: 910-256-4005
Wilmington Law Office Map

Durham Office
302 East Pettigrew Street
Suite 330
Durham, NC 27701

Toll Free: 800-662-1234
Phone: 919-544-3000
Durham Law Office Map