YES, we are available by phone and email! Our goal at Martin & Jones is to prioritize the health of our employees and their families while continuing to do the work needed for our clients. In response to recent COVID-19 developments, we have enabled our staff to work remotely while making certain that we can continue to do the work needed to protect and represent our clients. Our attorneys and staff will continue to be responsive to our clients and others with whom the firm works.

$4 Million Settlement For Young Woman Paralyzed By Untreated Epidural Infection

A 29-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with debilitating rheumatoid arthritis in all of her significant joints that left her legs contracted at 90 degrees. Her orthopedic surgeon recommended bilateral knee replacements to restore her ability to walk. Prior to surgery, she was to undergo several weeks on intense physical therapy to restore her range of motion. In an unusual treatment, she was given an epidural catheter to manage her pain during physical therapy.

One week before the surgery, she was experiencing signs and symptoms indicating an epidural infection. Her symptoms continued to worsen, and an epidurogram confirmed her epidural wasn’t working. Epidural analgesics and anesthetics were then increased to the maximum amount. The knee replacement surgery was performed without addressing the epidural infection.

Only when her left upper body developed paralysis and numbness, including left facial paralysis, was her epidural discontinued. By this time, she had suffered significant spinal cord damage and had permanently lost the use of both legs and one arm as well as control of her bowel and bladder.

Martin & Jones filed suit on behalf of this woman and took testimony from approximately 20 medical witnesses. Her case was settled for $4 million soon after a mediation.

(Cases or matters referenced do not represent the law firm’s entire record. Each case is unique and must be evaluated on its owns merits. The outcome of a particular case cannot be predicated upon a lawyer’s or a law firm’s past results. Unless otherwise specified, each of the following matters was contested on liability and/or damages, the opposing parties were represented, the matters involved complex legal and/or factual issues, and the law firm was successful in collecting the amounts stated. Case summaries are from 2000 through the present.)